Avoiding potholes on the road to a successful knowledge base transition

avoiding potholesTransitioning to a new knowledge base is one of the most exciting changes a customer support organization can go through. It’s a time of renewal that provides a natural opening to examine current workflows, organizational structure, and content. Change can bring upon great innovations in your business, but technology transitions come with great risks.

As a preview to our upcoming webinar, Secrets to success: Knowledge base transitions, we’re taking a look at some of the potholes you may encounter on the road to success.

Moving forward without a clear vision

Every successful project starts with a clearly defined vision of its end goals. When initiating a change as large as switching knowledge base providers, it’s even more critical to understand what the future will look like. Early in the technology selection process, you may have spelled out what your end goals are. As you learn more about your chosen technology and as new risks and opportunities arise, revisit these goals to see how this new information can help you add context to your goals.

Before a transition kicks off, you should be able to answer:

  • How do we measure success?
  • What does success look like?
  • What specific metrics will be affected?
  • How does new technology support these goals?

 

Underestimating the power of buy-in

We’ve talked about the importance of obtaining executive buy-in in our recent white paper, and of course a new technology can’t be implemented without leadership sign-off. But it’s just as important to make sure that presenting the benefits of a new technology to all impacted individuals, not just executives and stakeholders, is a part of your communication process.

Proactively sharing information about why a new knowledge base represents a great opportunity for everyone involved builds momentum and excitement. Avoiding the perception that a new technology is “change for the sake of change” is key to getting everyone on board with the transition.  

Some information you might proactively provide:

  • How will this change benefit knowledge base users, both internal and external?
  • What new features of the new technology will affect daily life for content creators and end users?
  • How does this transition align with company, departmental, and personal goals?

Further insight

In our upcoming webinar, Secrets to success: Knowledge base transitions, you’ll hear actionable recommendations on implementing new knowledge base technology. Our panel of expert knowledge professionals will share the best practices and lessons learned they’ve collected over their careers.

How content owners declutter your knowledge base

Archiving content is a perpetual hot topic for knowledge managers, and for good reason. One of the easiest ways to make a difference in the usability of support content is to remove outdated, inaccurate content. Archivable content clutters your search engine result pages, misdirects your audience, and in general, provides a poor experience to all who encounter it.archive_funnel

This low- or no-value content is often ignored until a major initiative kicks off: A content migration, a knowledge base transformation, a re-templating exercise. When content audits are baked into your content team’s routines, archivable content is addressed on an ongoing basis. In this article, we’ll show you how content ownership can eliminate informational clutter in your knowledge base.

Cultivate ownership

In the most efficient knowledge environments, every knowledge object belongs to an owner who is ultimately responsible for the health of their content. This content owner can be counted on to:

  • Know what content exists in their area of responsibility
  • Develop subject matter expertise on the content they own
  • Proactively identify gaps in existing content and opportunities to capture new knowledge
  • Manage performance of the support information within their area

The last bullet is key: One of the most important things a content owner is responsible for is contributing to the overall health of their piece of the knowledge base.

With ownership comes great responsibility

A content owner should have a variety of data points available to them in order to maximize the effectiveness of the knowledge base. He or she can review usage statistics to identify the difference between high-value and low-value content in their area.

While maintaining high-usage, high-value content is an obvious priority, content owners should also determine if low-usage content has the potential to become valuable with additional edits.

In the best case scenario, a content owner would review these metrics monthly. At the very least, we recommend reviewing content usage statistics at least quarterly. Expect the first audit of this content to auditing this content to be more time consuming, but as a content owner becomes more familiar with what content lives within their focus, the process becomes quicker.

How searching “early and often” improves your knowledge ecosystem’s health

In our recent webinar, Making Your Support Content Work Harder For You, experts Melissa Burch of Irrevo and David Kay of DB Kay & Associates covered a wealth of information on how to improve your knowledge base.

One of our audience members asked David Kay to speak in a little more depth about how utilizing best practices for search can enhance a knowledge program:

How does searching improve content quality? How can we incorporate this into our processes to maintain the health of my knowledge ecosystem?

Searching “early and often” is a cornerstone of the KCS practices for a number of reasons. First, by searching and understanding what we collectively know before solving a problem anew, we actually get the benefit of the knowledge in our KB. But searching has many more benefits:

  1. By searching throughout the resolution process, we make it far less likely that we’ll create duplicate content. For KBs, duplicates are death.
  2. If we don’t find content, our search terms capture important context from the requestor. These words should end up in the article that we ultimately create from the interaction
  3. If we struggled to find the article, then the search terms will be good to add to the article, to make it easier for the next person to find.

It’s sometimes difficult to get people who already know the answer to search and link. We need to reinforce the many benefits of searching and linking, even if we know the answer:

  • Link data gives us ammunition to drive improvements in the products and services
  • Link data targets value-added work in the Evolve loop
  • Every use is a review; if we’re not using, we’re not reviewing and content will get stale
  • Even if someone thinks they know the answer, that answer may have been updated or improved
  • If everyone uses the KB, we’re more consistent
  • It’s quicker and easier to search and link an article, and send it to the customer, than it is to write case notes or customer communications from scratch…even if we know the answer

You can watch the entire webinar on-demand to hear more great insights from David. Stay tuned to the Irrevo blog for more Q&A from this session.

Using images in support content: How, when, why?

In our recent webinar, Making Your Support Content Work Harder For You, experts Melissa Burch of Irrevo and David Kay of DB Kay & Associates covered a wealth of information on how to improve your knowledge base. One of the topics our audience wanted to hear more about was using images within support articles:

How many images should one support article include?

Melissa Burch:

We find that it’s best to show one image per step along the process. It’s really hard to give a specific number, but if your audience can’t find what they’re looking for, inserting an image can make it easier. But using too many creates a maintenance challenge for your organization.

David Kay:

Adding images pushes the steps lower below the fold which we’re always concerned about. But that’s helpful guidance to me, when I change context when going to a different part of the screen. Then it makes sense to add an image there.

Should animated GIFs be used in support content?

 

David Kay:

From my perspective  less is more. There are times for very high-value content that animations or videos are appropriate. We really want to restrict it to the highest value stuff just because of the difficulty of maintaining it. Everything we said about images goes double when it comes to animation or videos.

Melissa Burch:

The challenge everyone is faced with fundamentally is maintenance of content. It’s easier to create it than it is to maintain it, so we want to make sure we’re building content that is valuable and provides the right amount of information yet is efficient to create and maintain. we want to make sure that we maintain this content. Anything that makes that more difficult, you will want to evaluate from the perspective of your organization. It doesn’t mean that it’s wrong necessarily for everybody, but it does require some acknowledgement of maintenance going forward. 

Learn more

You can watch the entire webinar on-demand. Stay tuned to the Irrevo blog for more Q&A from this session, and follow us on Twitter to be the first to know when we share new answers.

Content templates: Your blueprint for support success

blueprintHave you ever walked into a room and touched the wall, looking for a light switch that didn’t exist? You expect a light switch there because that’s where they typically are. This same cycle has conditioned customers’ expectations of your support site. Like a blueprint for a house, content rules help your knowledge base meet those unconscious expectations to make for a seamless, usable experience. Studies have shown that a low-effort experience is a driving factor in cultivating repeat business.

The typical use case for a knowledge base article is simple: Customer has a question, customer finds an answer. Your products and services likely require more complex explanation than a quick FAQ. One best practice is to provide a framework for articles that makes it easy for content creators to include all of the necessary details while making it easy for customers to digest the information. These content templates are what put the light switches where customers expect to find them.

There are two universal content types – How To and Troubleshooting – but within many industries, other types of content types may be prevalent. Your most frequently used articles can tip you off to any other content templates you may need. Let’s take a deeper look at what a How To article must contain:

Overview

An introduction to the topic that confirms for the reader that they’re in the right place. Your overview is a great place to introduce customers to terms that may be new to them.

This article explains how to clean or descale your espresso machine.

Prerequisites

What does a customer need in order to use a service or product? Common prerequisites include pieces of information a customer must know, account statuses, or tangible items.  

To sign up for paper statements, you will need:

A Consumer or Business account in good standing

A copy of your most recent bill

Your account PIN

Procedure

By this point, your reader knows they’re looking at the right article, and has all the information they need to get started. The best Procedure sections use quickly scannable bulleted or numbered lists to convey information. Break down complex procedures into smaller steps.

To set an alarm on your clock radio, follow these steps:

  1. Press and hold the Alarm button on the side of your radio.
  2. Press the Hour and Minute buttons to select the desired time.
  3. Release the Alarm button.
  4. Move the Alarm Type slider to Radio or Buzzer as desired.

Escalation Path

One of the most important questions a support article needs to answer is, “What if that doesn’t work?” Providing the answer to “What next?” empowers your customers with information, even if the end result is that they need to contact you for further assistance. We recommend starting with a canned statement that links to your Contact page, and editing it to be specific to the article’s purpose.  

If you have additional questions on your bill, please contact us.

If you have followed the above steps and are still unable to print, please contact us.

Once you have these base elements, you’re off to a good start. The best content template is customized to include industry- and business-specific information. You may need to include technical requirements, exceptions, or other information that your customers expect to see.

promo_May26-2016On May 26th, Irrevo is hosting a webinar titled Making Your Support Content Work Harder For YouWe’ve invited special guest David Kay of DB Kay & Associates to help share actionable recommendations for improving the overall quality of your content and measuring support content success. RSVP today – We hope to see you there.

How to get your team to buy-in to new content authoring standards

In our recent webinar, The 5 Biggest KM Challenges You’ll Face, our presenters, Melissa Burch, Knowledge Strategist of Irrevo and Brian Bombard, Senior Director of Proactive Support Delivery for Oracle Applications, shared their wisdom on tackling the trickiest problems common to every KM transformation. One of the toughest parts of transforming your strategy is getting buy-in from the people most affected by change.

How do you communicate and get buy-in on content authoring standards?

Melissa Burch, Irrevo:
Build your content contributors into creating your authoring standards as much as possible. Does it mean does that you go to them with a blank sheet of paper and ask them “Well, what should our publishing standards be?” No, but bringing them an early version of the publishing standards and asking for feedback while these are in development can be helpful. This holds true for many of the knowledge management programs holistically. If don’t solicit feedback and you try to roll out changes too quickly , it’s possible that you will run into resistance. Things that are imposed on humans are usually not very well received; it’s just not our style. We like to participate in the process, it’s just human nature.

Brian Bombard, Oracle:
The only thing I would add is once you’ve come up with those standards, make sure you build it into your toolset. Make it as easy as possible. If an engineer selects a certain doc type, make it so that they don’t have to remember what template they need to use.

Melissa Burch:
Making those publishing requirements very difficult to put into practice because they are not supported by the tool is certainly going to put a barrier between a person who’s very busy, but wants to share what they know with others and keeping the ability to do that as streamlined as possible is great advice.

Further Insight

If you missed the live broadcast of The 5 Biggest KM Challenges You’ll Face, you can watch our presentation on-demand.

Measuring content health and knowledge satisfaction: Expert tips

In our recent webinar, The 5 Biggest KM Challenges You’ll Face, our presenters, Melissa Burch, Knowledge Strategist of Irrevo and Brian Bombard, Senior Director of Proactive Support Delivery for Oracle Applications, agreed that measuring success and content health are both critical to the success of a knowledge management strategy. During our Audience Q&A, they elaborated further:

Q: How do you measure content health?

Brian Bombard:

We have an initiative around where we’re trying to target the top 50 documents. Believe it or not, the top 50 articles represented about 8% of the total use by customers  and engineers, so it was an area we could start to dig in to. The way that we started to try to ensure that it’s healthy. We went back and started being creative in a KM session.
We were able to get the SR’s where that document is view. What we would do is we would start to look and see if there was anything that that piece of content needs. Often times it might be missing a symptom or maybe the title isn’t a representative as it could be. So we would start to do some findability aspects and then we would look at any time an engineer told us that a particular article or document solved the SR, we would go back to the SR and look at why the customer wouldn’t be able to find the end document.
There’s a lot of work that we’re doing around the top docs but then also from a  content health perspective we look at the whole process. Are we hitting our targets for creating content? Are we getting content to customers? Are we processing your comments and feedback to make sure we’re addressing them within the first seven days? We also pay a lot of attention to currency. We want to make sure that the content were giving is a fresh as possible to our user base. When you look at all of these, you can assess your content health. You get a sense of what the state of the program is when you look at it from that perspective.

Q: How do you measure knowledge satisfaction?

Brian Bombard, Oracle:

We use surveys. One type that we use is called a transactional survey. After a customer’s service request is closed, they receive a survey that asks questions about KB effectiveness and also the findability of the content. We’ve also done quarterly surveys to help us track satisfaction. Our knowledge base also has the ability for customers to provide us with a thumbs up/thumbs down response to the content. I’ll be honest, we get probably .01% of that type of feedback, so generally we rely on the other two methods.

Melissa Burch, Irrevo:

Adding to what Brian said, in order to measure satisfaction with the content, more than likely you will have to use a multi-pronged approach. Only using the thumbs up/thumbs down probably won’t give you enough data points to be effective, but you certainly wouldn’t want to eliminate that as an option. You’ll need to identify some other avenues for gathering the data points you’ll need to have a robust data set in order to be effective.

Further Insight

If you missed the live broadcast of The 5 Biggest KM Challenges You’ll Face, you can watch our presentation on-demand.

The pros weigh in: Managing security concerns with proactive customer service

In our recent webinar, Preparing for the Next Evolution of Self Service, our expert panel agreed that customer service is evolving from a responsive model to a more proactive one. With customer activity being monitored for potential failure points, security is at the top of everyone’s mind. One of our audience members posed this question to our presenters:

Do customers have an option to opt-in to proactive services, or are those services just baked in to their offerings? I’m wondering about companies with privacy issues or objections to having a vendor “watching.” How do you deal with those objections?

Melissa Burch, Knowledge Strategist, Irrevo:

My sense is that this differs depending on the product. For instance, with credit card protections, the banks don’t really provide an opt-in because they are really protecting their own interests. If we want to use credit cards, we have to tolerate the inconveniences that come with theft protections. However, with monitoring and notification services for most products should offer the option to utilize them or not. With regard to the “watching”, I believe that companies have been doing that with ill-intent. We aren’t being “watched” in order to provide us with conveniences and protections that would need. Instead, we are “watched” to determine what additional products we might want to purchase. When products we buy provide us with “service” through monitoring, notifications and maintenance, then I see consumers having more tolerance. So, overcoming reluctance to participate requires consistent data protections and the delivery on promises to use the data for good.

Matthew Seaman, VP of Service Management and Operations, PTC

For the majority of companies starting on this journey today, we are seeing opt in, or opt-out, capabilities for the data being collected and sent.  In our own experience, the key to customer’s connecting and sending data have hinged on two main aspects.  First is transparency.  We allow the customer to see and control the data being captured and sent.  We also provide white papers and legal documents that can be used with security teams to understand the way we are connecting and how we manage the data once it arrives. 

Being open and partnering has gone a long way.  We have no products sending data that the customer is not aware of.   Second is Value.  As we all are experience today, we have given up a measure of personal control of information due to the value being delivered back to us.  We all know that location services used on or smart phones to get directions can also be used to track our movements.  We allow this though due to the convenience and value we get in return, and we do not often experience the misuse of that data. In our journey to have customer connect, before worrying about any internal value our company could gain, we started with how to deliver value to our customers.  If the value outweighs the concern, then a large percent of people will opt-in. 

Learn more

If you missed the live broadcast, you can watch a recording of this webinar. Stay tuned to the Irrevo blog for more Q&A from this session, and follow us on Twitter to be the first to know when we share new answers.

The future of self-service: Intelligent avatars for customer support

In our recent webinar, Preparing for the Next Evolution of Self Service, Jordi Torras, CEO & Founder of Inbenta, shared his vision of how some companies are already taking steps to future-proof their customer experience program. One way is through the use of an avatar: An AI virtual assistant who answers questions from customers using natural language.

Our audience asked:

Do avatars use the exact same KB content used by analysts or on web self service, or is a ‘special’ set of knowledge created for the avatar?

“Avatars can use the same version of the Knowledge Base, and new knowledge can be added or edited as the Virtual Assistant collects more user questions. Also Decision Trees can be added to the KB that not only answer questions, but are able to gather information from users and effectively solve a problem.”

Jordi noted that avatars can increase self-service success to between 85-90%. Our audience wanted to know more about this statistic:

“We do use surveys to measure customer satisfaction and the overall quality of the experience after a hybrid chat is finished.
We also use Deflection Rates which are measured as the percentage of user sessions with the avatar that did NOT become a session with human chat, email or call.”

Learn More

If you missed the live broadcast, you can watch a recording of this webinar. Stay tuned to the Irrevo blog for more expert Q&A.

Irrevo named to KMWorld 100 Companies that Matter in Knowledge Management, 2016

KMW_3_2016 (3)We are excited to announce that Irrevo has been named one of KMWorld’s 100 Companies that Matter in Knowledge Management for 2016.

For the past decade and a half, KMWorld has created this annual list of organizations that advance the field of knowledge management by meeting and anticipating the changing needs of clients and end-users alike. 2016 marks our second time making this highly-esteemed list.

“This is an amazing honor for Irrevo! This is a great indication that we’re on the right track and continuing to get noticed in the KM industry and among some very esteemed peers,” said Jason Kaufman, Irrevo’s President & CEO.

“Being named to our list of 100 Companies That Matter in Knowledge Management is a prestigious designation because it represents the best in innovation, creativity and functionality,” says KMWorld Editor Sandra Haimila. “The 100 Companies offer solutions designed to help users and customers find what they need whenever and wherever they need it … and what they need is the ability to access, analyze and share crucial knowledge.”